‘Yes’ vote for action in pensions dispute

Members of UCU in the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) have voted for a campaign of sustained industrial action in protest at the imposition of changes to their pensions.

USS, which is the second largest private pension scheme in the UK, is imposing changes on its members which include:

• increased contributions
• lower pensions for new staff
• reduced protection against inflation
• reduced pensions for staff made redundant

Over three-quarters (77%) of UCU members who voted, voted for the sustained campaign of industrial action. The union is now discussing a long-term national plan of action with its branches. The action is likely to begin in mid-October and UCU warned today that it will continue until there is a breakthrough.

Actions under consideration to start the campaign include working-to-contract and working-to-rule. If the employers still refuse to negotiate then the union will consider setting exams but not marking them and, if required, escalating the action to include a full assessment boycott. UCU members also voted in favour of strike action, which the union said may be a feature of its campaign.

UCU said an increased turnout compared to the last ballot, despite the fact that the vote took place during the summer months, was evidence of members’ strong feelings. The union said the employers had waged a campaign of misinformation, including a taxpayer-subsidised advert aimed at persuading staff the scheme was in trouble based on a snapshot of its value, rather than a proper valuation.

Last month leaked documents revealed that any deficit in the USS scheme was expected to be lower than publicly predicted.

UCU general secretary, Sally Hunt, said: ‘These changes have been imposed without the agreement of staff, and our vote shows members are determined to defend their pension rights. Despite a taxpayer-funded campaign of misinformation, staff know that the imposition of these detrimental changes are wholly unnecessary.

‘Industrial action is always a last resort for educators and we will work closely with students to minimise problems where possible. However, the nature of any industrial dispute means disruption and there will be widespread and sustained disruption unless USS is prepared to return to the negotiating table.

‘Today I once again repeat my plea to the employers to turn away from a policy of imposition without agreement. Without real and meaningful negotiations our universities, and those who work and study in them, will suffer, which is in no one’s interests.’

Result:

• Are you prepared to take industrial action consisting of strike action?
  YES: 9,494 (58.06%)
  NO: 6,857 (41.94%)
• Are you prepared to take industrial action consisting of action short of a strike?
  YES: 12,510 (76.69%)
  NO: 3,802 (23.31%)
• Turnout 42%